A Quantum Origin Of Life ? ( Evolution from Non Living to Living entities)
A Quantum Origin Of Life ?
by : Aria Ratmandanu
" This article is dedicated to the readers, who do not
know what life is, yet they have life"
The origin of life is one of the great unsolved problems of science. In the
nineteenth century, many scientists believed that life was some sort of magic
matter. The continued use of the term “organic chemistry” is a hangover
from that era. The assumption that there is a chemical recipe for life led
to the hope that, if only we knew the details, we could mix up the right
stuff in a test tube and make life in the lab.
Most research on biogenesis has followed that tradition, by assuming
chemistry was a bridge—albeit a long one—from matter to life. Elucidating the chemical pathway has been a tantalizing goal, spurred on by the
famous Miller-Urey experiment of 1952, in which amino acids were made by
sparking electricity through a mixture of water and common gases. But this concept turned out to be something of a blind alley, and
further progress with pre-biotic chemical synthesis has been frustratingly
slow. Most research on biogenesis has followed that tradition, by assuming
chemistry was a bridge—albeit a long one from matter to life. Elucidat-
ing the chemical pathway has been a tantalizing goal, spurred on by the
famous Miller-Urey experiment of 1952, in which amino acids were made by
sparking electricity through a mixture of water and common gases. But this concept turned out to be something of a blind alley, and
further progress with pre-biotic chemical synthesis has been frustratingly
slow.
In 1944, Erwin Schrodinger published his famous lectures under the title "What is Life ?" and ushered in the age of molecular
biology. Schodinger argued that the stable transmission of genetic information from generation to generation in discrete bits implied a quantum
mechanical process, although he was unaware of the role of or the specifics
of genetic encoding. The other founders of quantum mechanics, including
Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and Eugene Wigner shared Schrodinger’s
belief that quantum physics was the key to understanding the phenomenon of life. This was a reasonable assumption at the time. Shortly before, quantum mechanics had solved the problem of matter, by explaining atomic and
molecular structure, chemical bonds and the nature of solids. It seemed
natural that quantum mechanics would soon also solve the riddle of the
living state of matter. To a physicist, life seems fundamentally weird, even
bizarre, in its properties, and bears almost no resemblance to any other
type of physical system. It is tempting to suppose that quantum mechanics
possesses enough weirdness to account for it.
Erwin Schrodinger and his famous "Schrodinger equation".
Although there is no agreed definition of life, all living organisms are information processors: they store a genetic database and replicate it, with
occasional errors, thus providing the basis for natural selection. The direction of information flow is bottom up: the form of the organism and its
selective qualities can be traced back to molecular processes. The question then arises of whether, since this information flows from the quantum
realm, any vestige of its quantum nature, other than its inherent random-
ness, is manifested. Biological molecules serve the role of both specialized
chemicals and informational molecules, mirroring the underlying dualism of
phenotype/genotype. In computer terminology, chemistry is akin to hardware, information to software.
A complete understanding of the origin of
life demands an explanation for both hardware and software. Most research in biogenesis focuses on the hardware aspect, by seeking a plausible
chemical pathway from non-life to life. Though this work has provided important insights into how and where the basic building blocks of life might
have formed, it has made little progress in the much bigger problem of
how those building blocks were assembled into the specific and immensely
elaborate organization associated with even the simplest autonomous organism [Davies (2003)]. But viewing life in terms of information processing transforms the entire conceptual basis of the problem of biogenesis.
Reproduction is one of the defining characteristics of life. Traditionally,
biologists regarded reproduction as the replication of material structures,
whether DNA molecules or entire cells. But to get life started all one
needs is to replicate information. In recent years our understanding of the
nature of information has undergone something of a revolution with the
development of the subjects of quantum computation and quantum information processing.
The starting point of this enterprise is the replacement
of the classical “bit” by its quantum counterpart, the “qubit”. As a quantum system evolves, information is processed; significantly, the processing
efficiency is enhanced because quantum superposition and entanglement
represent a type of computational parallelism. In some circumstances this
enhancement factor can be exponential, implying a vast increase in computational speed and power over classical information processing.
The difference between classical bit "Computer" and Qubit "Quantum Computer"
Biological systems are quintessential information processors. The informational
molecules are RNA and DNA. Although quantum mechanics is crucial to
explain the structure of these molecules, it is normally disregarded when it
comes to their information processing role. That is, biological molecules are
assumed to store and process classical bits rather than qubits. In an earlier
paper [Davies (2004)] I speculated that, at least in some circumstances,
that assumption may be wrong. It is then helpful to distinguish between
three interesting possibilities:
1. Quantum mechanics played a key role in the emergence of life, but
either ceased completely to be a significant factor when life became
established, or was relegated to a sporadic or subsidiary role in its
subsequent development. Nevertheless, there may be relics of ancient
quantum information processing systems in extant organisms, just as
there are biochemical remnants that give clues about ancient biological,
or even pre-biological, processes.
2. Life began classically, but evolved some efficiency-enhancing “quantum
tricks.” For example, if biological systems were able to process information quantum mechanically, they would gain a distinct advantage in
speed and power, so it might be expected that natural selection would
discover and amplify such capabilities, if they are possible.
3. Life started out as a classical complex system, but later evolved towards
“the quantum edge,” where quantum uncertainty places a bound on the
efficiency of bio-molecular processes.
As there is little doubt that some cellular machinery (e.g. photosynthesis) does exploit quantum mechanics , the issue arises of whether quantum enhancement is a product
of evolution , or a remnant of life’s quantum origin.
The starting point of my hypothesis is the existence of a quantum replicator, a quantum system that can copy information with few errors The information could be instantiated in the form
of qubits, but that is not necessary, the quantum replication of classical
bits is sufficient. A quantum replicator need not be an atomic
system that clones itself. Indeed, there is a quantum no-cloning theorem that forbids the replication of wave functions. This information
might well be in binary form, making use of the spin orientation of an electron or atom for example. Quantum mechanics thus provides an automatic
discretization of genetic information. Quantum replicators certainly exist
in Nature. The simplest case is the stimulated emission of photons. Henceforth I shall refer to this hypothetical system as
Q-life. Let me illustrate the basic idea of Q-life with a simple, and almost cer-
tainly unsatisfactory, example. Consider an array of atomic spins embedded
in a condensed matter system, defined relative to some fiducial direction.
The initial template A may be described by a ket vector such as
Symbolically, the overall evolution of the state is AB −→ AA. Because
the transition has erased the information contained in state B, the replication process is asymmetric and irreversible, and accompanied by an increase
in entropy. The system thus requires an energy source to drive the reaction
forward. This could be in the form of an exciton that hops along the array
of atoms, flipping the B spins where necessary one-by-one but leaving the
A spins unchanged. The foregoing model is very simplistic. A more realistic form of interaction, and a closer analogue of DNA replication, would be if the template
array A first created a complementary array
which then generated the original array by “base-pairing”. An additional
simplification is that the model described so far neglects interactions between neighbouring spins. Such interactions produce greater complexity,
and so increase the opportunity to encode algorithmically incompressible
information.
How, then, did organic life arise ? Information can readily be passed
from one medium to another. At some stage Q-life could have coopted large organic molecules for back-up memory, much as a computer uses a hard-
disk. The computer’s processor (analogous to Q-life) is much faster than
the hard disk drive (analogous to RNA and DNA), but more vulnerable and
in need of a continual input of energy. Robust computing systems require
something like a hard disk. Eventually the organic molecular system would
literally have taken on a life of its own. The loss in processing speed would
have been offset against the greater complexity, versatility and stability
of organic molecules, enabling organic life to invade many environments
off-limits to Q-life.
The hypothesis I am proposing is that the transition from non-life to life was
a quantum-mediated process, and that the earliest form of life involved non-
trivial quantum mechanical aspects.











Komentar
Posting Komentar